Head to head
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro vs Qwen Image 3
Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.
Short answer
Qwen Image 3 beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in all 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.4 vs 4.3), portraits & people (4.1 vs 4.0), product photos (4.4 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.3 vs 4.2). Qwen Image 3 is cheaper ($0.041 vs $0.170 per image). MAI-Image-2.5-Pro is faster (30.3 s vs 32.2 s median).
Last tested
Results by use case
| Model | Rank | Score | $/image | Time to image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interior & architecture | ||||
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #10 of 13 | 4.3 | $0.170 | 30.0 s |
| Qwen Image 3wins | #9 of 13 | 4.4 | $0.040 | 39.8 s |
| Portraits & people | ||||
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #11 of 13 | 4.0 | $0.170 | 30.6 s |
| Qwen Image 3wins | #10 of 13 | 4.1 | $0.040 | 17.0 s |
| Product photos | ||||
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #9 of 13 | 4.2 | $0.170 | 34.2 s |
| Qwen Image 3wins | #3 of 13 | 4.4 | $0.042 | 61.0 s |
| Social media ads | ||||
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #12 of 13 | 4.2 | $0.170 | 29.1 s |
| Qwen Image 3wins | #7 of 13 | 4.3 | $0.040 | 13.8 s |
Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test
Same prompt, side by side
Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.
Café storefront with a sign · Interior & architecture
Modern house at blue hour · Interior & architecture
Marble kitchen with three pendants · Interior & architecture
Scandinavian living room · Interior & architecture
Bathroom with patterned tiles · Interior & architecture
Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people
Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people
Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people
Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people
Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people
Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos
Headphones held in hand · Product photos
Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos
Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos
Sneaker flat lay · Product photos
App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads
Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads
Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads
UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads
Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads
Frequently asked questions
Is MAI-Image-2.5-Pro better than Qwen Image 3?
No. Qwen Image 3 beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in all 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.4 vs 4.3), portraits & people (4.1 vs 4.0), product photos (4.4 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.3 vs 4.2). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.
Which is cheaper, MAI-Image-2.5-Pro or Qwen Image 3?
Qwen Image 3: $0.041 per image on average vs $0.170 for MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, via the fal.ai API.
Which is faster, MAI-Image-2.5-Pro or Qwen Image 3?
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro: a median 30.3 s from request to finished image vs 32.2 s for Qwen Image 3, queue time included.
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro or Qwen Image 3 for interior & architecture?
Qwen Image 3 scored higher for interior & architecture: 4.4/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #9 vs #10 of 13 models.
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro or Qwen Image 3 for portraits & people?
Qwen Image 3 scored higher for portraits & people: 4.1/5 vs 4.0/5, ranking #10 vs #11 of 13 models.
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro or Qwen Image 3 for product photos?
Qwen Image 3 scored higher for product photos: 4.4/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #3 vs #9 of 13 models.
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro or Qwen Image 3 for social media ads?
Qwen Image 3 scored higher for social media ads: 4.3/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #7 vs #12 of 13 models.