Same prompt, every model

Elderly potter's hands at work

The same prompt, sent to every model.

Short answer

For this prompt, Grok Imagine 2.0 produced the best image (4.3/5). Krea 2 Turbo was the fastest (3.7 s) and Krea 2 Turbo the cheapest ($0.0080). All 10 models received the identical prompt and settings.

Last tested

Prompt

Close-up documentary photo of an elderly woman's wrinkled hands shaping wet clay on a spinning pottery wheel, with clay slip on her fingers. Warm window light; her smiling face is softly out of focus in the background.

What this tests

  • Exactly two hands with five fingers each, natural anatomy
  • Visible age: wrinkles, veins and knuckle detail
  • Wet clay and slip look physically real
  • Sharp hands with a softly blurred face behind them

Quality vs. price

Each dot is one model's image for this prompt: higher is better, further left is cheaper.

Cheap and good2.53.03.54.04.5$0.01$0.02$0.05$0.1$0.2Price per image (log scale)Score (1–5)FLUX.2 [dev]: 3.33 · $0.01FLUX.2 [dev]FLUX.2 [pro]: 3.00 · $0.03FLUX.2 [pro]GPT Image 2: 4.00 · $0.17GPT Image 2Grok Imagine 2.0: 4.33 · $0.06Grok Imagine 2.0Ideogram V4.5: 4.33 · $0.06Ideogram V4.5Krea 2 Turbo: 3.67 · $0.008Krea 2 TurboNano Banana Pro: 3.33 · $0.15Nano Banana ProQwen Image 3: 3.67 · $0.04Qwen Image 3Recraft V4.1: 3.67 · $0.04Recraft V4.1Seedream 5.0 Pro: 4.33 · $0.1Seedream 5.0 Pro
Quality vs. price
ModelScorePrice per image
FLUX.2 [dev]3.33$0.01
FLUX.2 [pro]3.00$0.03
GPT Image 24.00$0.17
Grok Imagine 2.04.33$0.06
Ideogram V4.54.33$0.06
Krea 2 Turbo3.67$0.008
Nano Banana Pro3.33$0.15
Qwen Image 33.67$0.04
Recraft V4.13.67$0.04
Seedream 5.0 Pro4.33$0.1

Quality vs. time to image

Wait for this image, including queue time: higher is better, further left is faster.

Fast and good2.53.03.54.04.55 s10 s20 s50 s100 sTime to image (log scale)Score (1–5)FLUX.2 [dev]: 3.33 · 14 sFLUX.2 [dev]FLUX.2 [pro]: 3.00 · 11 sFLUX.2 [pro]GPT Image 2: 4.00 · 101 sGPT Image 2Grok Imagine 2.0: 4.33 · 53 sGrok Imagine 2.0Ideogram V4.5: 4.33 · 9.5 sIdeogram V4.5Krea 2 Turbo: 3.67 · 3.7 sKrea 2 TurboNano Banana Pro: 3.33 · 27 sNano Banana ProQwen Image 3: 3.67 · 75 sQwen Image 3Recraft V4.1: 3.67 · 11 sRecraft V4.1Seedream 5.0 Pro: 4.33 · 40 sSeedream 5.0 Pro
Quality vs. time to image
ModelScoreTime to image
FLUX.2 [dev]3.3314 s
FLUX.2 [pro]3.0011 s
GPT Image 24.00101 s
Grok Imagine 2.04.3353 s
Ideogram V4.54.339.5 s
Krea 2 Turbo3.673.7 s
Nano Banana Pro3.3327 s
Qwen Image 33.6775 s
Recraft V4.13.6711 s
Seedream 5.0 Pro4.3340 s
FLUX.2 [dev]

Editor pending · AI 3.3 · $0.012 · 13.8 s (2.9 s generating)

AI judge: Two wrinkled hands with clay slip shaping a small pot, warm window light and a smiling face in the background. The right hand fingers are stubby and clumped with clay blobs, and the face is only mildly blurred. The overall rendering looks over-processed and less photographic.

FLUX.2 [pro]

Editor pending · AI 3.0 · $0.030 · 10.8 s

AI judge: Very detailed aged skin and realistic wet clay, with the face softly blurred and cropped behind. The hands are interlocked confusingly, and a blurred extra hand or fist at lower left reads as a third hand. That breaks the exactly-two-hands requirement.

GPT Image 2

Editor pending · AI 4.0 · $0.171 · 101.1 s

AI judge: Two sharp, heavily wrinkled hands with five-finger anatomy and wet grey slip, with a softly blurred smiling face behind. The window light is fairly cool rather than warm. An odd clay wedge shape behind the pot is a minor defect.

Grok Imagine 2.0

Editor pending · AI 4.3 · $0.060 · 53.1 s

AI judge: Two aged, wrinkled hands with wet slip shaping a pot on a visibly spinning wheel, with a smiling face softly blurred behind and warm window light. Left-hand fingers are slightly bunched and hard to count. Overall convincing documentary feel.

Ideogram V4.5

Editor pending · AI 4.3 · $0.060 · 9.5 s

AI judge: Two heavily wrinkled hands with visible knuckles and clay slip, sharp in front of a softly blurred smiling face in warm window light. Five fingers per hand are plausible, but the clay-caked thumbs look oversized and lumpy. Clay surface looks slightly dry rather than wet.

Krea 2 Turbo

Editor pending · AI 3.7 · $0.0080 · 3.7 s (1.0 s generating)

AI judge: Two aged hands with convincing wrinkles, knuckles and clay slip, in warm window light. However the smiling face is nearly as sharp as the hands rather than softly out of focus, so the close-up hands-first framing is missed. Anatomy is plausible, though the clay looks slightly dry.

Nano Banana Pro

Editor pending · AI 3.3 · $0.150 · 27.5 s

AI judge: Attractive film-like studio scene with wrinkled hands, slip and window light. Only one hand is clearly visible with an ambiguous extra thumb, so the two-hand requirement is unclear, and the face is off to the edge rather than softly behind the hands. It reads more as a medium shot than a close-up.

Qwen Image 3

Editor pending · AI 3.7 · $0.040 · 74.6 s

AI judge: Two hands with plausible finger counts and strong age detail (wrinkles, knuckles), clay slip and a convincingly spinning wheel in warm window light. The skin wrinkling is somewhat exaggerated and crackled. The face is cropped at the eyes and not softly blurred behind the hands as requested.

Recraft V4.1

Editor pending · AI 3.7 · $0.035 · 11.4 s

AI judge: Close-up of two very aged, veined hands with wet slip on a spinning wheel, smiling face blurred behind and window light. The left hand fingers merge into the clay and finger count is unclear. Clay looks wet and glossy as requested.

Seedream 5.0 Pro

Editor pending · AI 4.3 · $0.101 · 40.5 s

AI judge: Two aged hands with visible wrinkles, veins and knuckles shape clay on the wheel, with slip on the fingers, and her smiling face is softly blurred behind. The visible fingers are anatomically plausible, though thumbs are hidden and the clay looks a bit dry and smooth rather than wet. Warm window light fits the documentary look.