Head to head

Grok Imagine 2.0 vs MAI-Image-2.5-Pro

Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.

Short answer

Grok Imagine 2.0 beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in all 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.7 vs 4.3), portraits & people (4.3 vs 4.0), product photos (4.6 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.2). Grok Imagine 2.0 is cheaper ($0.061 vs $0.170 per image). MAI-Image-2.5-Pro is faster (30.3 s vs 64.4 s median).

Last tested

Results by use case

ModelRankScore$/imageTime to image
Interior & architecture
Grok Imagine 2.0wins#1 of 134.7$0.06087.4 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#10 of 134.3$0.17030.0 s
Portraits & people
Grok Imagine 2.0wins#4 of 134.3$0.06066.2 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#11 of 134.0$0.17030.6 s
Product photos
Grok Imagine 2.0wins#2 of 134.6$0.06256.6 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#9 of 134.2$0.17034.2 s
Social media ads
Grok Imagine 2.0wins#6 of 134.5$0.06064.6 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#12 of 134.2$0.17029.1 s

Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test

Same prompt, side by side

Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.

Café storefront with a sign · Interior & architecture

Modern house at blue hour · Interior & architecture

Marble kitchen with three pendants · Interior & architecture

Scandinavian living room · Interior & architecture

Bathroom with patterned tiles · Interior & architecture

Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people

Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people

Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people

Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people

Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people

Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos

Grok Imagine 2.0: E-commerce packshot of a matte kraft paper stand-up coffee pouch with a resealable zip, on a plain warm white background with a soft contact shadow, a few roasted coffee beans in front. The label has three lines of text: "HIGHLAND ROAST" in bold serif, "Single Origin · Ethiopia" below it, and "250 g" at the bottom.
Grok Imagine 2.0Editor 5.0 · AI 4.8 · 44.9 sSee all models →
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro: E-commerce packshot of a matte kraft paper stand-up coffee pouch with a resealable zip, on a plain warm white background with a soft contact shadow, a few roasted coffee beans in front. The label has three lines of text: "HIGHLAND ROAST" in bold serif, "Single Origin · Ethiopia" below it, and "250 g" at the bottom.
MAI-Image-2.5-ProAI 4.6 · 34.2 sSee all models →

Headphones held in hand · Product photos

Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos

Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos

Sneaker flat lay · Product photos

App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads

Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads

Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads

UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads

Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Imagine 2.0 better than MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?

Yes. Grok Imagine 2.0 beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in all 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.7 vs 4.3), portraits & people (4.3 vs 4.0), product photos (4.6 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.2). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.

Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine 2.0 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?

Grok Imagine 2.0: $0.061 per image on average vs $0.170 for MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, via the fal.ai API.

Which is faster, Grok Imagine 2.0 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?

MAI-Image-2.5-Pro: a median 30.3 s from request to finished image vs 64.4 s for Grok Imagine 2.0, queue time included.

Grok Imagine 2.0 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for interior & architecture?

Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for interior & architecture: 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #1 vs #10 of 13 models.

Grok Imagine 2.0 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for portraits & people?

Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for portraits & people: 4.3/5 vs 4.0/5, ranking #4 vs #11 of 13 models.

Grok Imagine 2.0 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for product photos?

Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for product photos: 4.6/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #2 vs #9 of 13 models.

Grok Imagine 2.0 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for social media ads?

Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for social media ads: 4.5/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #6 vs #12 of 13 models.