Head to head

FLUX 3 vs MAI-Image-2.5-Pro

Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.

Short answer

FLUX 3 beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in all 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.5 vs 4.3), portraits & people (4.1 vs 4.0), product photos (4.4 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.2). FLUX 3 is cheaper ($0.024 vs $0.170 per image) and faster (26.3 s vs 30.3 s median).

Last tested

Results by use case

ModelRankScore$/imageTime to image
Interior & architecture
FLUX 3wins#7 of 134.5$0.02425.1 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#10 of 134.3$0.17030.0 s
Portraits & people
FLUX 3wins#8 of 134.1$0.02428.2 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#11 of 134.0$0.17030.6 s
Product photos
FLUX 3wins#5 of 134.4$0.02423.8 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#9 of 134.2$0.17034.2 s
Social media ads
FLUX 3wins#3 of 134.5$0.02427.5 s
MAI-Image-2.5-Pro#12 of 134.2$0.17029.1 s

Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test

Same prompt, side by side

Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.

Café storefront with a sign · Interior & architecture

Modern house at blue hour · Interior & architecture

Marble kitchen with three pendants · Interior & architecture

Scandinavian living room · Interior & architecture

Bathroom with patterned tiles · Interior & architecture

Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people

Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people

Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people

Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people

Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people

Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos

Headphones held in hand · Product photos

Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos

Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos

Sneaker flat lay · Product photos

App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads

Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads

Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads

UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads

Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads

Frequently asked questions

Is FLUX 3 better than MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?

Yes. FLUX 3 beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in all 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.5 vs 4.3), portraits & people (4.1 vs 4.0), product photos (4.4 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.2). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.

Which is cheaper, FLUX 3 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?

FLUX 3: $0.024 per image on average vs $0.170 for MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, via the fal.ai API.

Which is faster, FLUX 3 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?

FLUX 3: a median 26.3 s from request to finished image vs 30.3 s for MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, queue time included.

FLUX 3 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for interior & architecture?

FLUX 3 scored higher for interior & architecture: 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #7 vs #10 of 13 models.

FLUX 3 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for portraits & people?

FLUX 3 scored higher for portraits & people: 4.1/5 vs 4.0/5, ranking #8 vs #11 of 13 models.

FLUX 3 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for product photos?

FLUX 3 scored higher for product photos: 4.4/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #5 vs #9 of 13 models.

FLUX 3 or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for social media ads?

FLUX 3 scored higher for social media ads: 4.5/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #3 vs #12 of 13 models.