Head to head
FLUX.2 [pro] vs MAI-Image-2.5-Pro
Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.
Short answer
FLUX.2 [pro] beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in 1 of 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.5 vs 4.3). They tie on portraits & people (4.0 each), product photos (4.2 each) and social media ads (4.2 each). FLUX.2 [pro] is cheaper ($0.030 vs $0.170 per image) and faster (10.7 s vs 30.3 s median).
Last tested
Results by use case
| Model | Rank | Score | $/image | Time to image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interior & architecture | ||||
| FLUX.2 [pro]wins | #8 of 13 | 4.5 | $0.030 | 11.2 s |
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #10 of 13 | 4.3 | $0.170 | 30.0 s |
| Portraits & people | ||||
| FLUX.2 [pro] | #12 of 13 | 4.0 | $0.030 | 10.8 s |
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #11 of 13 | 4.0 | $0.170 | 30.6 s |
| Product photos | ||||
| FLUX.2 [pro] | #10 of 13 | 4.2 | $0.030 | 9.9 s |
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #9 of 13 | 4.2 | $0.170 | 34.2 s |
| Social media ads | ||||
| FLUX.2 [pro] | #11 of 13 | 4.2 | $0.030 | 10.5 s |
| MAI-Image-2.5-Pro | #12 of 13 | 4.2 | $0.170 | 29.1 s |
Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test
Same prompt, side by side
Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.
Café storefront with a sign · Interior & architecture
Modern house at blue hour · Interior & architecture
Marble kitchen with three pendants · Interior & architecture
Scandinavian living room · Interior & architecture
Bathroom with patterned tiles · Interior & architecture
Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people
Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people
Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people
Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people
Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people
Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos
Headphones held in hand · Product photos
Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos
Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos
Sneaker flat lay · Product photos
App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads
Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads
Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads
UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads
Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads
Frequently asked questions
Is FLUX.2 [pro] better than MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?
Mostly, yes. FLUX.2 [pro] beats MAI-Image-2.5-Pro in 1 of 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.5 vs 4.3). They tie on portraits & people (4.0 each), product photos (4.2 each) and social media ads (4.2 each). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.
Which is cheaper, FLUX.2 [pro] or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?
FLUX.2 [pro]: $0.030 per image on average vs $0.170 for MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, via the fal.ai API.
Which is faster, FLUX.2 [pro] or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro?
FLUX.2 [pro]: a median 10.7 s from request to finished image vs 30.3 s for MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, queue time included.
FLUX.2 [pro] or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for interior & architecture?
FLUX.2 [pro] scored higher for interior & architecture: 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #8 vs #10 of 13 models.
FLUX.2 [pro] or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for portraits & people?
They tie for portraits & people at 4.0/5 (#12 and #11 of 13 models).
FLUX.2 [pro] or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for product photos?
They tie for product photos at 4.2/5 (#10 and #9 of 13 models).
FLUX.2 [pro] or MAI-Image-2.5-Pro for social media ads?
They tie for social media ads at 4.2/5 (#11 and #12 of 13 models).