Head to head
Grok Imagine 2.0 vs Qwen Image 3
Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.
Short answer
Grok Imagine 2.0 beats Qwen Image 3 in 2 of 3 use cases we tested: portraits & people (4.2 vs 4.0) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.3). They tie on product photos (4.2 each). Qwen Image 3 is cheaper ($0.041 vs $0.061 per image) and faster (24.7 s vs 63.8 s median).
Last tested
Results by use case
| Model | Rank | Score | $/image | Time to image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portraits & people | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #2 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.060 | 66.2 s |
| Qwen Image 3 | #6 of 10 | 4.0 | $0.040 | 17.0 s |
| Product photos | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0 | #5 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.062 | 56.6 s |
| Qwen Image 3 | #2 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.042 | 61.0 s |
| Social media ads | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #4 of 10 | 4.5 | $0.060 | 64.6 s |
| Qwen Image 3 | #7 of 10 | 4.3 | $0.040 | 13.8 s |
Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test
Same prompt, side by side
Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.
Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people
Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people
Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people
Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people
Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people
Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos
Headphones held in hand · Product photos
Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos
Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos
Sneaker flat lay · Product photos
App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads
Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads
Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads
UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads
Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Imagine 2.0 better than Qwen Image 3?
Mostly, yes. Grok Imagine 2.0 beats Qwen Image 3 in 2 of 3 use cases we tested: portraits & people (4.2 vs 4.0) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.3). They tie on product photos (4.2 each). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.
Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine 2.0 or Qwen Image 3?
Qwen Image 3: $0.041 per image on average vs $0.061 for Grok Imagine 2.0, via the fal.ai API.
Which is faster, Grok Imagine 2.0 or Qwen Image 3?
Qwen Image 3: a median 24.7 s from request to finished image vs 63.8 s for Grok Imagine 2.0, queue time included.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Qwen Image 3 for portraits & people?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for portraits & people: 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5, ranking #2 vs #6 of 10 models.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Qwen Image 3 for product photos?
They tie for product photos at 4.2/5 (#5 and #2 of 10 models).
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Qwen Image 3 for social media ads?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for social media ads: 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #4 vs #7 of 10 models.