Head to head
Grok Imagine 2.0 vs Nano Banana Pro
Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.
Short answer
Grok Imagine 2.0 and Nano Banana Pro split the 3 use cases we tested: Grok Imagine 2.0 wins product photos (4.2 vs 4.1), Nano Banana Pro wins portraits & people (4.4 vs 4.2). They tie on social media ads (4.5 each). Grok Imagine 2.0 is cheaper ($0.061 vs $0.150 per image). Nano Banana Pro is faster (21.7 s vs 63.8 s median).
Last tested
Results by use case
| Model | Rank | Score | $/image | Time to image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portraits & people | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0 | #2 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.060 | 66.2 s |
| Nano Banana Prowins | #1 of 10 | 4.4 | $0.150 | 23.4 s |
| Product photos | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #5 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.062 | 56.6 s |
| Nano Banana Pro | #7 of 10 | 4.1 | $0.150 | 20.3 s |
| Social media ads | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0 | #4 of 10 | 4.5 | $0.060 | 64.6 s |
| Nano Banana Pro | #1 of 10 | 4.5 | $0.150 | 21.7 s |
Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test
Same prompt, side by side
Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.
Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people
Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people
Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people
Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people
Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people
Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos
Headphones held in hand · Product photos
Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos
Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos
Sneaker flat lay · Product photos
App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads
Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads
Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads
UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads
Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Imagine 2.0 better than Nano Banana Pro?
It depends on the use case. Grok Imagine 2.0 and Nano Banana Pro split the 3 use cases we tested: Grok Imagine 2.0 wins product photos (4.2 vs 4.1), Nano Banana Pro wins portraits & people (4.4 vs 4.2). They tie on social media ads (4.5 each). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.
Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine 2.0 or Nano Banana Pro?
Grok Imagine 2.0: $0.061 per image on average vs $0.150 for Nano Banana Pro, via the fal.ai API.
Which is faster, Grok Imagine 2.0 or Nano Banana Pro?
Nano Banana Pro: a median 21.7 s from request to finished image vs 63.8 s for Grok Imagine 2.0, queue time included.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Nano Banana Pro for portraits & people?
Nano Banana Pro scored higher for portraits & people: 4.4/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #1 vs #2 of 10 models.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Nano Banana Pro for product photos?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for product photos: 4.2/5 vs 4.1/5, ranking #5 vs #7 of 10 models.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Nano Banana Pro for social media ads?
They tie for social media ads at 4.5/5 (#4 and #1 of 10 models).