Head to head
Grok Imagine 2.0 vs Luma Uni-1 Max
Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.
Short answer
Grok Imagine 2.0 beats Luma Uni-1 Max in 3 of 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.7 vs 4.6), product photos (4.6 vs 4.3) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.3). Luma Uni-1 Max wins portraits & people (4.4 vs 4.3). Grok Imagine 2.0 is cheaper ($0.061 vs $0.102 per image) and faster (64.4 s vs 81.4 s median).
Last tested
Results by use case
| Model | Rank | Score | $/image | Time to image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interior & architecture | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #1 of 13 | 4.7 | $0.060 | 87.4 s |
| Luma Uni-1 Max | #6 of 13 | 4.6 | $0.102 | 102.2 s |
| Portraits & people | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0 | #4 of 13 | 4.3 | $0.060 | 66.2 s |
| Luma Uni-1 Maxwins | #3 of 13 | 4.4 | $0.102 | 80.5 s |
| Product photos | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #2 of 13 | 4.6 | $0.062 | 56.6 s |
| Luma Uni-1 Max | #6 of 13 | 4.3 | $0.102 | 81.7 s |
| Social media ads | ||||
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #6 of 13 | 4.5 | $0.060 | 64.6 s |
| Luma Uni-1 Max | #9 of 13 | 4.3 | $0.102 | 80.4 s |
Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test
Same prompt, side by side
Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.
Café storefront with a sign · Interior & architecture
Modern house at blue hour · Interior & architecture
Marble kitchen with three pendants · Interior & architecture
Scandinavian living room · Interior & architecture
Bathroom with patterned tiles · Interior & architecture
Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people
Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people
Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people
Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people
Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people
Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos
Headphones held in hand · Product photos
Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos
Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos
Sneaker flat lay · Product photos
App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads
Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads
Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads
UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads
Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Imagine 2.0 better than Luma Uni-1 Max?
Mostly, yes. Grok Imagine 2.0 beats Luma Uni-1 Max in 3 of 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.7 vs 4.6), product photos (4.6 vs 4.3) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.3). Luma Uni-1 Max wins portraits & people (4.4 vs 4.3). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.
Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine 2.0 or Luma Uni-1 Max?
Grok Imagine 2.0: $0.061 per image on average vs $0.102 for Luma Uni-1 Max, via the fal.ai API.
Which is faster, Grok Imagine 2.0 or Luma Uni-1 Max?
Grok Imagine 2.0: a median 64.4 s from request to finished image vs 81.4 s for Luma Uni-1 Max, queue time included.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Luma Uni-1 Max for interior & architecture?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for interior & architecture: 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5, ranking #1 vs #6 of 13 models.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Luma Uni-1 Max for portraits & people?
Luma Uni-1 Max scored higher for portraits & people: 4.4/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #3 vs #4 of 13 models.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Luma Uni-1 Max for product photos?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for product photos: 4.6/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #2 vs #6 of 13 models.
Grok Imagine 2.0 or Luma Uni-1 Max for social media ads?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for social media ads: 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #6 vs #9 of 13 models.