Head to head
FLUX 3 vs Qwen Image 3
Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.
Short answer
FLUX 3 beats Qwen Image 3 in 2 of 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.3 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.3). They tie on portraits & people (4.0 each) and product photos (4.2 each). FLUX 3 is cheaper ($0.024 vs $0.041 per image) and faster (26.3 s vs 32.2 s median).
Last tested
Results by use case
| Model | Rank | Score | $/image | Time to image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interior & architecture | ||||
| FLUX 3wins | #7 of 11 | 4.3 | $0.024 | 25.1 s |
| Qwen Image 3 | #8 of 11 | 4.2 | $0.040 | 39.8 s |
| Portraits & people | ||||
| FLUX 3 | #6 of 11 | 4.0 | $0.024 | 28.2 s |
| Qwen Image 3 | #7 of 11 | 4.0 | $0.040 | 17.0 s |
| Product photos | ||||
| FLUX 3 | #2 of 11 | 4.2 | $0.024 | 23.8 s |
| Qwen Image 3 | #3 of 11 | 4.2 | $0.042 | 61.0 s |
| Social media ads | ||||
| FLUX 3wins | #6 of 11 | 4.5 | $0.024 | 27.5 s |
| Qwen Image 3 | #8 of 11 | 4.3 | $0.040 | 13.8 s |
Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test
Same prompt, side by side
Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.
Café storefront with a sign · Interior & architecture
Modern house at blue hour · Interior & architecture
Marble kitchen with three pendants · Interior & architecture
Scandinavian living room · Interior & architecture
Bathroom with patterned tiles · Interior & architecture
Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people
Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people
Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people
Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people
Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people
Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos
Headphones held in hand · Product photos
Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos
Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos
Sneaker flat lay · Product photos
App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads
Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads
Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads
UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads
Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads
Frequently asked questions
Is FLUX 3 better than Qwen Image 3?
Mostly, yes. FLUX 3 beats Qwen Image 3 in 2 of 4 use cases we tested: interior & architecture (4.3 vs 4.2) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.3). They tie on portraits & people (4.0 each) and product photos (4.2 each). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.
Which is cheaper, FLUX 3 or Qwen Image 3?
FLUX 3: $0.024 per image on average vs $0.041 for Qwen Image 3, via the fal.ai API.
Which is faster, FLUX 3 or Qwen Image 3?
FLUX 3: a median 26.3 s from request to finished image vs 32.2 s for Qwen Image 3, queue time included.
FLUX 3 or Qwen Image 3 for interior & architecture?
FLUX 3 scored higher for interior & architecture: 4.3/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #7 vs #8 of 11 models.
FLUX 3 or Qwen Image 3 for portraits & people?
They tie for portraits & people at 4.0/5 (#6 and #7 of 11 models).
FLUX 3 or Qwen Image 3 for product photos?
They tie for product photos at 4.2/5 (#2 and #3 of 11 models).
FLUX 3 or Qwen Image 3 for social media ads?
FLUX 3 scored higher for social media ads: 4.5/5 vs 4.3/5, ranking #6 vs #8 of 11 models.