Head to head
FLUX.2 [pro] vs Grok Imagine 2.0
Same prompts, same settings: how the two models compare on score, price and time to image in every use case we tested both on.
Short answer
Grok Imagine 2.0 beats FLUX.2 [pro] in 2 of 3 use cases we tested: portraits & people (4.2 vs 3.8) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.2). They tie on product photos (4.2 each). FLUX.2 [pro] is cheaper ($0.030 vs $0.061 per image) and faster (10.5 s vs 63.8 s median).
Last tested
Results by use case
| Model | Rank | Score | $/image | Time to image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portraits & people | ||||
| FLUX.2 [pro] | #9 of 10 | 3.8 | $0.030 | 10.8 s |
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #2 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.060 | 66.2 s |
| Product photos | ||||
| FLUX.2 [pro] | #4 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.030 | 9.9 s |
| Grok Imagine 2.0 | #5 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.062 | 56.6 s |
| Social media ads | ||||
| FLUX.2 [pro] | #9 of 10 | 4.2 | $0.030 | 10.5 s |
| Grok Imagine 2.0wins | #4 of 10 | 4.5 | $0.060 | 64.6 s |
Rank among every model scored for that use case. Price is the average and time the median per image. How we test
Same prompt, side by side
Both models received each prompt with identical settings. Click an image to enlarge it.
Corporate headshot on gray · Portraits & people
Four friends laughing outdoors · Portraits & people
Nurse with a readable name badge · Portraits & people
Elderly potter's hands at work · Portraits & people
Rembrandt-lit dramatic portrait · Portraits & people
Coffee pouch with a 3-line label · Product photos
Headphones held in hand · Product photos
Perfume on a black mirror · Product photos
Serum bottle on wet slate · Product photos
Sneaker flat lay · Product photos
App launch ad with a phone · Social media ads
Iced latte promo with a price · Social media ads
Pizza delivery 2-for-1 ad · Social media ads
UGC-style skincare selfie · Social media ads
Sneaker sale ad with a button · Social media ads
Frequently asked questions
Is FLUX.2 [pro] better than Grok Imagine 2.0?
Mostly, no. Grok Imagine 2.0 beats FLUX.2 [pro] in 2 of 3 use cases we tested: portraits & people (4.2 vs 3.8) and social media ads (4.5 vs 4.2). They tie on product photos (4.2 each). Scores are 1-5 on identical prompts and settings.
Which is cheaper, FLUX.2 [pro] or Grok Imagine 2.0?
FLUX.2 [pro]: $0.030 per image on average vs $0.061 for Grok Imagine 2.0, via the fal.ai API.
Which is faster, FLUX.2 [pro] or Grok Imagine 2.0?
FLUX.2 [pro]: a median 10.5 s from request to finished image vs 63.8 s for Grok Imagine 2.0, queue time included.
FLUX.2 [pro] or Grok Imagine 2.0 for portraits & people?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for portraits & people: 4.2/5 vs 3.8/5, ranking #2 vs #9 of 10 models.
FLUX.2 [pro] or Grok Imagine 2.0 for product photos?
They tie for product photos at 4.2/5 (#4 and #5 of 10 models).
FLUX.2 [pro] or Grok Imagine 2.0 for social media ads?
Grok Imagine 2.0 scored higher for social media ads: 4.5/5 vs 4.2/5, ranking #4 vs #9 of 10 models.